The Perspective and Orthographic Projection Matrix
Keywords: perspective and orthographic projection matrices, affine transformation matrix, clipping, clip space, homogeneous coordinates, Cartesian coordinates, perspective divide, NDC space, graphics API, OpenGL, Direct3D, GPU, fixed-function pipeline, programmable GPU rendering pipeline, vertex shader.Want to report bugs, errors or send feedback? Write at You can also contact us on Twitter and Discord. We do this for free, please be kind. Thank you.

News (August, 31): We are working on Scratchapixel 3.0 at the moment (current version of 2). The idea is to make the project open source by storing the content of the website on GitHub as Markdown files. In practice, that means you and the rest of the community will be able to edit the content of the pages if you want to contribute (typos and bug fixes, rewording sentences). You will also be able to contribute by translating pages to different languages if you want to. Then when we publish the site we will translate the Markdown files to HTML. That means new design as well.

That's what we are busy with right now and why there won't be a lot of updates in the weeks to come. More news about SaP 3.0 soon.

We are looking for native Engxish (yes we know there's a typo here) speakers that will be willing to readproof a few lessons. If you are interested please get in touch on Discord, in the #scratchapixel3-0 channel. Also looking for at least one experienced full dev stack dev that would be willing to give us a hand with the next design.

Feel free to send us your requests, suggestions, etc. (on Discord) to help us improve the website.

And you can also donate). Donations go directly back into the development of the project. The more donation we get the more content you will get and the quicker we will be able to deliver it to you.

21 mns read.

A Word of Warning

To understand the content of this lesson, you need to be familiar with the concept of matrix, transforming points from one space to another, perspective projection (including how coordinates of 3D points on the canvas are computed) and with the rasterization algorithm. Read the previous lessons and the lesson on Geometry if you are note familiar with these concepts (see links above).

Projection Matrices: What Are They?

Figure 1: multiplying a point by the perspective projection matrices gives another point which is the projection of P onto the canvas.

What are projection matrices? They are nothing more than 4x4 matrices, which are designed so that when you multiply a 3D point in camera space by one of these matrices, you end up with a new point which is the projected version of the original 3D point onto the canvas. More precisely, multiplying a 3D point by a projection matrix allows you to find the 2D coordinates of this point onto the canvas in NDC space.

Remember from the previous lesson, in NDC space the 2D coordinates of a point on the canvas are contained in the range [-1, 1]. This is at least the convention that is generally used by graphics API such as Direct3D or OpenGL.

Remember that they are essentially two conventions when it comes to NDC space. Coordinates are either considered to be defined in the range [-1, 1]. This is the case of most real-time graphics APIs such as OpenGL or Direct3D. Or they can also be defined in the range [0, 1]. The RenderMan specifications define them that way. You are entirely free to choose the convention you prefer. We will stick to the convention used by graphics API because this is essentially within this context that you will see these matrices being used.

Another way of saying it is that, multiplying a 3D point in camera-space by a projection matrix, has the same effect than all the series of operations we have been using in the previous lessons to find the 2D coordinates of 3D points in NDC space (this includes the perspective divide step and a few remapping operations to go from screen space to NDC space). In other words, this rather long code snippet which we have been using in the previous lessons:

// convert to screen space Vec2f P_screen; P_screen.x = near * P_camera.x / -P_camera.z; P_screen.y = near * P_camera.y / -P_camera.z; // now convert point from screen space to NDC space (in range [-1, 1]) Vec3f P_ndc; P_ndc.x = 2 * P_screen.x / (r - l) - (r + l) / (r - l); P_ndc.y = 2 * P_screen.y / (t - b) - (t + b) / (t - b);

Can be replaced with a single point-matrix multiplication. Assuming \(M_{proj}\) is a projection matrix, we can write:

Vec3f P_ndc; M_proj.multVecMatrix(P_camera, P_ndc);

The first version involves five variables: \(near\), \(t\), \(b\), \(l\) and \(r\) which are the near clipping plane, the top, bottom, left and right screen coordinates respectively. Remember that the screen coordinates are also computed normally from the near clipping plane as well as the camera angle-of-view (which, if you use a physically-based camera model, is calculated from a whole series of parameters such as the film gate size, the focal length, etc.). This is great, because it reduces a rather complex process into a simple point-matrix multiplication operation. The whole point of this lesson is to explain what \(M_{proj}\) is. Though looking at the two code snippet above, should somehow give you some ideas about what we will need in order to build this matrix. It seems like if this matrix replaces:

We will somehow have to pack in this matrix all the different variables that are part of these two steps. The near clipping plane as well as the screen coordinates. We will explain this in detail in the next chapters. Though before we get there, let's explain one important thing about projection matrices and points.

First projection matrices are used to transform vertices or 3D points, not vectors. Using a projection matrix to transform vector doesn't make any sense. These matrices are used to project vertices of 3D objects onto the screen in order to create images of these objects that follow the rules of perspective. Remember from the lesson on geometry that a point is also a form of matrix. A 3D point can be defined as a [1x3] row vector matrix (1 row, 3 columns). Keep in mind that we use the row-major order convention on Scratchapixel. From the same lesson, we know that matrices can only be multiplied by each other if the number of columns of the left matrix equals the number of rows of the right matrix. In other words the matrices [mxn][nxk] can be multiplied by each other but the matrices [nxm][kxn] can't. Though if you multiply a 3D point with a 4x4 matrix, you get [1x3][4x4] and technically what this means is that this multiplication simply can't be done!

The trick to make this operation possible is to treat points not as [1x3] vectors but as [1x4] vectors. Then, you can multiply this [1x4] vector by a 4x4 matrix. Now as usual with matrix multiplication, the result of this operation is another [1x4] matrix. This [1x4] matrix or 4D points in a way are called in mathematics a points with homogeneous coordinates. A 4D point can't be used as 3D point unless its fourth coordinate is equal to 1. When this is the case, the first three coordinates of a 4D point can be used as the coordinates of a standard 3D Cartesian point. We will study this conversion process from Homogeneous to Cartesian in detail in the next chapter.

Whenever we multiply a point by a 4x4 matrix, points are always treated as 4D points, but for a reason we will explain in the next chapters, when you use "conventional" 4x4 transformation matrices (the matrices we use the most often in CG to scale, translate or rotate objects for instance), this fourth coordinate doesn't need to be explicitly defined. But when a point is multiplied by a projection matrix, such as the perspective or orthographic projection matrices, this fourth coordinate needs to be dealt with explicitly. Which is why homogeneous coordinates are more often discussed within the context of projections than within the context of general transformations (even though projections are a form of transformation and even though you are also somehow using homogeneous coordinates when you deal with conventional transformation matrices. You only do so implicitly as we just explained).

What we call "convention" transformation 4x4 matrices belong to a class of transformation called affine transformations in mathematics. Projection matrices belong to a class of transformation called projective transformations. To multiply a point by any of these matrices, points actually have to be defined with homogeneous coordinates. You can find more information about homogeneous coordinates, affine and projective transformations in the next chapter and the lesson on geometry.

This essentially means that, the one and only time you have to deal with 4D points in a renderer is when you work with projection matrices. The rest of the time, you will never have to deal with them at least explicitly.

Projection matrices are also generally only used by programs that implement the rasterization algorithm. In itself, this is not a problem at all, but in the algorithm, there is a process called clipping (we haven't talked about it at all in the lesson on rasterization) that happens while the point is being transformed by the projection matrix. You read correctly: clipping, which is a process we will describe in the next chapters, happens somewhere when the points are being transformed by the projection matrix. Not before, nor after. So in essence, the projection matrix is used indirectly to "interleave" a process called clipping that is important in rendering (we will explain what clipping does in the next chapter). And this makes things even more confusing, because generally, when books get to the topic of projection matrices, they do also speak about clipping without really explaining why it is there, where it comes from and what relation it really has with the projection matrix (in fact it has none, it just happens that it is convenient to do it while the points are being transformed).

Where Are They Used and Why?

That is the real question. In fact in previous versions of the website, this lesson was not part of the basic rendering section. But we moved it because projection matrices is a very popular topic both on this website but also on specialized forums. They are still very confusing to many and if they are so popular, it must be for something. Not surprisingly, we also found the topic to be generally poorly documented, which is another one of these oddities, considering how important the subject matter is. Their popularity essentially comes from their use in real-time graphics APIs (such as OpenGL or Direct3D) which are themselves very popular due to their use in games and other common desktop graphics applications. What these APIs have in common is that they are used as an interface between your program and the GPU. Not surprisingly, and as something we already mentioned in the previous lesson, GPUs implement in their circuit the rasterization algorithm.

In old versions of the rendering pipeline used by GPUs (known as the fixed function pipeline), GPUs transformed points from camera to NDC space using a projection matrix. But the GPU didn't know how to build this matrix itself. As a programmer, it was your responsibility to build it and pass it on to the graphics card yourself. That essentially meant that you were required to know how to build the matrix in the first place.

// don't use this code - it uses functions deprecated in OpenGL current version // set the projection matrix glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION); glLoadIdentity(); glFrustum(l, r, b, t, n, f); // set the matrix using screen coordinates and near/far clipping planes glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW); glLoadIdentity(); glTranslate(0, 0, 10); ...

Don't use this code though. It is only mentioned for reference and historical reasons. We are not supposed to use OpenGL that way anymore (these functionalities are now deprecated).

In the more recent "programmable" rendering pipeline, the process is slightly different. First, the projection matrices doesn't convert points from camera space to NDC space directly, but it converts them into some intermediate space called clip space (though this was the same in the old "fixed function" pipeline but we just didn't mention it to avoid confusing you). Don't worry too much about it for now. But to make it short, let's say that in clip space, points have homogeneous coordinates (do you remember the 4D points we talked about earlier?). In the modern programmable GPU rendering pipeline, this point-matrix multiplication (the transformation of vertices by the projection matrix) takes place in what we call a vertex shader. A vertex shader is nothing else than a small program if you wish, whose job is to transform vertices making up the 3D objects of your scene from camera space to clip space. A simple vertex shader takes a vertex as an input variable, a projection matrix (which is also a member variable of the shader) and set a pre-defined global variable (called gl_Position in OpenGL) as the result of the input vertex multiplied by the projection matrix. Note that gl_Position and the input vertex are both declared as vec4, in other words as points with homogeneous coordinates. Here is an example of a basic vertex shader:

uniform mat4 projMatrix; in vec3 position; void main() { gl_Position = projMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0); }

Figure 2: the vertex shader transforms vertices to clip space.

This vertex shader is executed by the GPU to process every vertex in the scene. In a typical program using the OpenGL or Direct3D API, you store the vertex and the connectivity data (how are these vertices connected to each other to form the mesh's triangles) into the GPU's memory, and the GPU then processes this data (the vertex data in this particular case) to transform them from whatever space they are in when you pass them on to the GPU, to clip space. The space the vertices are in when they are processed by the vertex shader totally depends on you.

Don't worry too much if you are not familiar with any graphics API. Or maybe you are familiar with Direct3D but not with OpenGL, though the principles are exactly the same, so you should be able to find similarities easily. Regardless, just try to understand what the code is doing. In the main CPU program, we just set the projection matrix and the model view matrix (which combines the object-to-world and the work-to-camera transform), and multiply these two matrices together so that rather than passing two matrices to the vertex shader, only one is needed. The OpenGL API requires that we find the location of the variable we are looking for in a shader using the glGetUniformLocation() call.

Don't worry if you don't know how glGetUniformLocation() works. But in short it takes a program as the first argument and the name of a variable you are looking for on this program, and returns the location of this variable. You can then later use this location to set the shader variable using a glUniform() call. A program in OpenGL or Direct3D combines a vertex shader and a fragment shader. You first need to combine these shader in a program, and the program is then applied or assigned to an object. Both shaders define how the object is transformed from whatever space the model is in when the vertex shader is executed to clip space (this is the role of the vertex shader) and then defines its appearance (that's the function of the fragment shader).
Once the location is found, we can set this shader variable using the glUniformMatrix4fv(). When the geometry will be rendered, the vertex shader will be executed which as a result, will transform vertices from object space to clip space. It will do so by multiplying the vertex position (in object space) by the matrix PM which combines the effect of the projection matrix with the model-view matrix. Hope this all makes sense.

This process is central to the way objects are rendered on GPUs. Though this lesson is not an introduction to the GPU rendering pipeline, thus we don't want to get into too much detail at this point, but hopefully these explanations are enough for you to at least understand the concept. And regardless of whether you use the old or the new rendering pipeline, you are still somehow required to build the projection matrix yourself. And this is why projection matrices in general are so important and consequently why they are so popular on CG forums.

Now, note that in the new rendering pipeline, using a projection matrix is actually not absolutely required. All that is required is that you transform vertices from whatever space they are in, to clip space. Whether you use a matrix for this, or just write some code that does the same thing than what the matrix does, is not important as long as the result is the same. For example you could very much write:

uniform float near, b, t, l, r; // near clip plane and screen coordinates in vec3 position; void main() { // does the same thing than a gl_Position.x = Mproj * position gl_Position.x = ... some code here ...; gl_Position.y = ... some code here ...; gl_Position.z = ... some code here ...; gl_Position.w = ... some code here ...; }

Hopefully you understand what we mean when we say you can either use the matrix or just write some code that sets gl_Position like if you had used a projection matrix. Obviously, this wasn't possible in the fixed-function pipeline (because the concept of vertex shader didn't exist back then) but the point we are trying to make here, is that it is not strictly required any more to use projection matrices if you do not wish so. The advantage of being able to replace it with some other code, is that it gives you more flexibility on the way vertices are transformed. Though, in 99% of the cases you will be more likely to use a standard projection than not and even if you do not wish to use the matrix, you will still need to understand how the matrix is built in order to replace the point-matrix multiplication with some equivalent code (and transform the vertex coordinates one by one).

Figure 3: passing on the projection matrix and the vertex data from the CPU to the GPU pipeline.

All you need to remember really from this chapter is that:

All we need to now, is to learn how this matrix is built. And what clip space is.

Orthographic and Perspective Projection Matrix

Finally and to conclude this chapter, you may have noticed that the lesson is called "The Perspective and Orthographic Projection Matrix", and you may wonder what the difference is between the two. First, let's say that they are both projections matrices. In other words, their function is to somehow project 3D points onto a 2D surface. We are already familiar with the perspective projection process. When the angle of view becomes very small (in theory when it tends to 0) then the four lines defining the frustum's pyramid get parallel to each other. In this particular configuration, there is no more foreshortening effect. In other words, an object size in the image stays constant regardless of its distance to camera. This is what we call an orthographic projection. Visually, we find an orthographic projection obviously less natural than a perspective projection, however this form of projection is nonetheless useful in some cases. Sim City is also an example of game that was rendered with an orthographic projection (image above). This gives the game a unique look.

Projection Matrix and Ray-Tracing

As we mentioned a few times already, in ray tracing, points don't need to be projected to the screen. Instead, rays emitted from the image plane are tested for intersections with the objects from the scene. Thus, projection matrices are not used in ray-tracing.

What's Next?

We found that the easiest way to learn about projection matrices and all the things we just talked about, is to start with learning how to build a very basic one. Once you understand what these homogeneous coordinates are, it will also become simpler to speak about clipping and other concepts which indirectly relate to projection matrices.

The simple perspective projection matrix that we will build in chapter three, won't be as sophisticated as the perspective projection matrix used in OpenGL or Direct3D (which we will also study in this lesson). As mentioned, the goal of chapter three is just to explain the principle behind projection matrices. In other words, how they work. We said that a projection matrix remaps vertices from whatever space they were in to clip space. Though, for the next two chapters, we will get back to our basis definition of the projection matrix which is that it converts points from camera space to NDC space. We will study the more generic case or more complex case in which points are actually converted to clip space in chapter four (in which we will explain how the OpenGL matrix works). For now, don't worry about clip space and keep this definition in mind: "projection matrices convert vertices from camera space to NDC space" (though keep in mind that this definition is only temporary).